<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>George Brunton Team &#187; housing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laveentosurprise.com/tag/housing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laveentosurprise.com</link>
	<description>Your Real Estate Counselors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:23:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Old information is dangerous information</title>
		<link>http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/old-information-is-dangerous-information/</link>
		<comments>http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/old-information-is-dangerous-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George and Cheryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix housing market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix real estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laveentosurprise.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The article titled &#8220;5 Housing Markets That Have Further to Fall&#8221; is using the old standard of slow behind the times information is Standard &#38; Poor’s Case-Shiller Index. If you think this information is showing you something current think again. My next post will give you some really current information the title of the article [...]<p><a href="http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/old-information-is-dangerous-information/">Old information is dangerous information</a> is a post from: <a href="http://laveentosurprise.com">George Brunton Team</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The article titled &#8220;5 Housing Markets That Have Further to Fall&#8221; is using the old standard of slow behind the times information is Standard &amp; Poor’s Case-Shiller Index. If you think this information is showing you something current think again.</p>
<p>My next post will give you some really current information the title of the article is &#8220;You missed the market in Phoenix!&#8221;</p>
<p><a class="alignleft" title="Read the article" href="http://realestate.yahoo.com/promo/5-housing-markets-that-have-further-to-fall.html;_ylc=X3oDMTFuNTBiYnQ0BF9TAzI3MTYxNDkEX3MDOTc2MjA0NjUEc2VjA2ZwLXRvZGF5BHNsawNmdXJ0aGVyLXRvLWZhbGw-" target="_blank">full article</a></p>
<p><a href="http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/old-information-is-dangerous-information/">Old information is dangerous information</a> is a post from: <a href="http://laveentosurprise.com">George Brunton Team</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/old-information-is-dangerous-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home-price data has its flaws</title>
		<link>http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/home-price-data-has-its-flaws/</link>
		<comments>http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/home-price-data-has-its-flaws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Putnam, Jr.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix real estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/home-price-data-has-its-flaws/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phil found another gem of an article on the news you hear and see every day! Top officials with the National Association of Realtors and Standard &#38; Poor&#8217;s, which issues the S&#38;P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index, agreed this week their monthly reports are giving imprecise readings of price changes at all levels &#8212; national, state and [...]<p><a href="http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/home-price-data-has-its-flaws/">Home-price data has its flaws</a> is a post from: <a href="http://laveentosurprise.com">George Brunton Team</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Phil found another gem of an article on the news you hear and see every day!</strong></p>
<p>Top officials with the National Association of Realtors and Standard &amp;  Poor&#8217;s, which issues the S&amp;P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index, agreed this week  their monthly reports are giving imprecise readings of price changes at all  levels &#8212; national, state and regional &#8212; due to rare market conditions that are  skewing survey results.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7bB242EC7A-7A08-49E4-8CB7-F0808F8EF52D%7d&amp;siteid=nwhpf" target="_blank">MarketWatch Ariticle</a></p>
<p><a href="http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/home-price-data-has-its-flaws/">Home-price data has its flaws</a> is a post from: <a href="http://laveentosurprise.com">George Brunton Team</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/home-price-data-has-its-flaws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the RealEstateJournal Archives</title>
		<link>http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/from-the-realestatejournal-archives/</link>
		<comments>http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/from-the-realestatejournal-archives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Putnam, Jr.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix real estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/from-the-realestatejournal-archives/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Â FHA May Aid Those &#8216;Underwater&#8217; on Loans Phil found this article for us by Damian Paletta From The Wall Street Journal Online March 31, 2008 WASHINGTON &#8212; The Bush administration is considering regulatory changes to aid homeowners who owe more money on their mortgages than their homes are worth, people familiar with the proposal said. [...]<p><a href="http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/from-the-realestatejournal-archives/">From the RealEstateJournal Archives</a> is a post from: <a href="http://laveentosurprise.com">George Brunton Team</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="articleCopy"></p>
<h1 class="articleTitle">Â FHA May Aid Those</h1>
<p>&#8216;Underwater&#8217; on Loans</p>
<p>Phil found this article for us</p>
<p><!-- END hooded headline --> 	     <span id="byl" style="font-family: times new roman,times,serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal"> by Damian Paletta<br />
From <a href="http://www.wsj.com/wsjgate?source=homesite&amp;URI=/">The Wall Street Journal Online</a><br />
<span class="aTime">March 31, 2008</span> </span><br />
WASHINGTON &#8212; The Bush administration is considering regulatory  changes to aid homeowners who owe more money on their mortgages than their homes  are worth, people familiar with the proposal said.</p>
<p>The Department of Housing and Urban Development plan would  enable homeowners who are &#8220;underwater&#8221; on their mortgages to qualify for a  partial backstop through HUD&#8217;s Federal Housing Administration, these people  said.</p>
<p>HUD Secretary Alphonso Jackson &#8220;is examining the potential for  FHA to be a solution for these borrowers,&#8221; Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said  Wednesday.</p>
<p>The FHA is central to multiple plans to revitalize the housing  market and prevent foreclosures.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Democrats are trying to pass legislation that would  allow the FHA to insure up to an additional $400 billion in mortgages by  requiring lenders to take partial losses on loans and refinance borrowers into  more affordable products. HUD&#8217;s proposal is likely to be much smaller in scale  and is expected to offer partial insurance for certain borrowers, leaving  lenders on the hook for some losses.</p>
<p>Lenders, real-estate agents, and other housing-industry  officials have complained to HUD that FHA&#8217;s current framework makes it too  difficult for homeowners to qualify, partly because FHA won&#8217;t accept homeowners  who have missed a payment in the previous six months.</p>
<p>HUD&#8217;s new plan, recently submitted to the White House&#8217;s Office  of Management and Budget, would allow many more people to qualify, though it  still is unclear how. The OMB must review the proposal and approve it.</p>
<p>In an interview last week with the Washington Times, Mr.  Jackson said the plan he submitted to the White House would provide partial  insurance for certain loans in areas where house prices are falling.</p>
<p>&#8220;I just made a proposal this morning to the White House for  those loans that are underwater,&#8221; Mr. Jackson said, according to the Washington  Times. &#8220;We will insure 80 to 85% of the loan &#8212; give ourselves some leeway even  if it falls a little more.&#8221;</p>
<p>HUD spokesman Stephen O&#8217;Halloran wouldn&#8217;t confirm Mr. Jackson&#8217;s  comments to the Washington Times or that anything has been submitted to the  White House.</p>
<p>&#8220;The secretary was referring to one possible idea that has been  out there for some time,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>HUD had $21.3 billion in its mortgage-insurance fund at the end  of 2007 to protect against losses. At the end of February, the agency insured  3.8 million loans with a total unpaid balance of $364.7 billion.</p>
<p>HUD and the Bush administration have been under pressure to  step up efforts to help stabilize the country&#8217;s housing market.</p>
<p>Depending on the breadth of Mr. Jackson&#8217;s plan, a HUD proposal  could steal momentum from Democrats&#8217; legislative efforts. But Democrats aren&#8217;t  likely to endorse whatever the Bush administration approves.</p>
<p>Relations between Democrats and Mr. Jackson have become  fractious in recent months, as lawmakers have openly criticized his leadership.  Connecticut Sen. Christopher Dodd last week called on Mr. Jackson to resign.</p>
<p>The White House has said it supports Mr. Jackson.</p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" width="150">
<tr>
<td><script src="http://www.bankrate.com/jsfeeds/wsjr-natl-mtgloan-avgs.js" type="text/javascript"></script></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><em>Email your comments to <a href="mailto:rjeditor@dowjones.com">rjeditor@dowjones.com</a>.</em></p>
<p></span></p>
<p><a href="http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/from-the-realestatejournal-archives/">From the RealEstateJournal Archives</a> is a post from: <a href="http://laveentosurprise.com">George Brunton Team</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laveentosurprise.com/real-estate/from-the-realestatejournal-archives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
